My article for The Deloitte Times on IPOs of Russian Banks. Yeah, IPO is a trendy topic they're really fit or it! ) It's good that their going public will at least nominally reduce the state's role in the banking system. Though, this fact is rather like a water drop in a desert...
Russian banks are fit for IPO
Russian banks must raise equity through IPO to secure their own finances. Alexander Chaichits Čajčyc argues they are fit for the challenge.
Russian capital markets are set to take a new step in their evolution this year with the flotation of the first major banks and other financial institutions. Two large Russian banks, Sberbank and VTB, are conducting IPOs this spring.
Sberbank is the largest national bank in Russia and one of the few with shares already traded on the stock market. A successor of the Soviet system of savings banks, it has over 20,000 branches and sub-branches, and the value of its assets is six times higher than that of its nearest rivals. The bank is also fourth among Russian companies in market capitalization. The bank’s share placement in March, known as the “people’s IPO” from the state’s efforts to distribute shares among the public, raised RUR 230.2bn (USD 8.8bn) by selling 2.587mn shares. Funds raised will finance the development of the bank for the next three years.
VTB (former Vneshtorgbank) has the second largest net assets among banks in Russia. Amongst debt issued by Russian banks, VTB’s bonds and Eurobonds have the highest credit ratings with Moody’s and Fitch. VTB’s IPO is the next step in a large-scale strategy to expand into the Western European market of investment services.
The current major shareholder of Sberbank and VTB is the Russian government, with a 99.9 percent share in VTB. The bank’s IPO will decrease the Government’s stake by to 75 percent plus one share. The state’s majority ownership of Sberbank fell from 63.7 percent to 60 percent in its March offering.
The media and business communities are keeping a keen eye on Sberbank and VTB to see who will secure a more successful IPO. Analysts predict that the stateowned banks’ IPOs are just the beginning of a future IPO boom for Russian banking.
The advantages of a public offering for banks are generally the same as for non-financial institutions. As the bank grows, it becomes unfeasible to sustain the debt/equity ratio required by the Central Bank by simply regulating loans raised. To have its two feet firmly on the ground, the bank needs to increase its equity. This may be done in three ways: by raising funds from existing shareholders, by selling a stake to a strategic investor, or by issuing equity or debt on public markets.
All three capital raising initiatives have their pitfalls. Existing shareholders are not always ready to absorb the complete issue, especially when it is a large amount. The sale of a large stake to a strategic investor requires care and precision in the search for an investor, which will in turn result in the emergence of a new power balance among shareholders, and changes to the management structure. Again, a strategic investor’s resources may not be large enough to cover the needs of a fast-growing bank.
The most reliable tool in this respect is an initial public offering. First, the market is more able to cope with a large issue than a strategic investor. Second, capital dilution through an IPO does not necessarily result in the emergence of a new major shareholder which challenges the existing power balance.
Floating a Russian bank on a stock exchange and complying with tough issuer requirements on reporting and transparency can demonstrate its business management standards. Publicly traded shares are liquid and quoted in real time, making them sensitive to the continuing performance of the bank. All this makes a positive impact on the bank’s reputation, which should potentially allow it to raise additional capital at a lower price.
2005-2006 saw the IPOs of three Chinese and three Japanese banks, as well as others in Austria, France, Greece, and the Netherlands. In 2006, two new world records were set for IPO capital raised. Both the world’s largest IPOs were from state-owned banks.
On 1 June, the Bank of China placed its stock on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, raising USD 9.7bn. In the six months following this, the record IPO volume was beaten again, also by a Chinese bank. In October, the Hong Kong and Singapore Stock Exchanges started trading shares in the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, which managed to raise almost USD 22bn.
Sberbank is one of just a few Russian banks currently traded on the stock market. Last year, AKB Rosbank prepared for an IPO, but the whole package was sold to a strategic investor at the last minute. Many large and mid-sized banks intend to go public, encouraged by The Central Bank of Russia. All this is evidence of a potentially massive inflow of banks’ shares to the stock market: Russian banks are considered fit for IPO. Much of the preceding IPOs’ success will depend on the pioneers, Sberbank and VTB, which explains the particular interest in their placements. Hardly anyone doubts that the first fry will be far from a flop.
Alexander Čajčyc, Deloitte
Rosbank, Russian Banks and Brokers Reports
Posts
2 comments:
My dear Alexander,
What can I say to you? Your message on the "trendy topic" of IPO's is so upbeat...
Enjoy the binge before the hangover...
In the late nineteenth century russian bond flotations were also a "trendy topic"; Russia bilked foreign investors (mainly Frecnh) to the tune of billions of gold roubles. The bonds all came with a russian government guarantee.
Not a single one was ever paid back...
Please read the following warning.
Sincerely,
Karolus.
RUSSIAN IPO INVESTOR ALERT
French holders of Russian government bonds remind investors that the Russian Federation is still in default today (May 2007) on their estimate of some US$ 90 billion owed to them since the Bolshevik, then the Soviet, and now the Russian Federation governments have all unilaterally repudiated Tsarist debt and refused any form of contact or dialogue with their legitimate bona fide creditors.
They also remind investors that in its Sep. 15th 2006 report entitled "Governance matters: a decade of measuring the quality of governance", the WORLD BANK has rated Russia's governance comparable to that of Swaziland, Zambia and Kazakhstan. Russia came 151st out of 208 countries in terms of (...) accountability, quality of regulatory bodies, and rule of law, (...). In particular, rule of law (i.e. the courts and the quality of contract enforcement) was judged as effective in Russia as it is in Ecuador, Indonesia, and Bangladesh. Nicaragua, East Timor, and China's ability to control corruption was judged similar to Russia's.
On February 26th 2007 the St. Petersburg Times, quoting a report from Vedomosti, wrote that "Surgutneftegaz managers covertly hold 72 % of the secretive oil firm" and that Deutsche UFG analysts had had to "raise its estimate number of outstanding shares from less than 26 billion to (...) 43 billion" which "implies a 40% dilution in the value of the stock".
In Paris on April 3rd 2007 to launch the merged NYSE-EURONEXT entity Mr. John Thain, the New York Stock Exchange CEO, warned that he was "very concerned about the quality of corporate governance, the transparency of company financials and the protection of minority shareholders. A number of Russian companies raise serious questions around these issues."
Despite these findings, and the main rating agencies' knowledge that Russia is in default on US$ 90 billion of Tsarist debt, Russia is rated "INVESTMENT GRADE" whereas it should clearly be in "SELECTIVE DEFAULT".
French bondholders intend to pursue their claim until full settlement at present value, by any legal means and in any jurisdiction they deem appropriate.
EVERY POTENTIAL INVESTOR IN RUSSIA MUST BE MADE AWARE OF THESE RISKS.
FRENCH CREDITORS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION STRONGLY ADVISE AGAINST ANY FORM OF INVESTMENT IN A COUNTRY WHOSE SOLVENT GOVERNMENT HAS IN THEIR VIEW SYTEMATICALLY REFUSED TO FULFIL ITS NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, REFUSES ALL CONTACT AND DIALOGUE WITH ITS LEGITIMATE BONA FIDE CREDITORS, AND REFUSES TO DISCLOSE LIABILITIES WORTH US$ 90 BILLION.
May 2007
The USSR has abandoned liability on Imperial Russia's debt, but AFAIK the post-Soviet Russian Federation has been repaying debts of both the Empire and the USSR - and was successful at least with those of the Soviet Union.
Well, you know, Russia is a highly risky country to have business with. One can make huge returns - but the main thing then is not to delay with getting your money outta here :,( It has stabilised in last years, but we can never know what's gonna happen when oil prices drop again. Still, nothing seems to scare Western investors: neither the YUKOS affair, nor the problems with human rights and democracy. Foreign investmants to Russia have doubled in 2006 comparing to 2005...
Post a Comment